

When comparing and contrasting Marjane Satrapi's
Persepolis, and David B's
Epileptic, the only similiarities I could find were that they are both in black and white, and that they are both telling a story of a childhood. So my question is, what is the effect of the way each author tells their story that makes them different?
First, let's look at Persepolis. The author illustrates her panels with few detail and for the most part, everyone looks the same ( but maybe with a different expression, like the picture above). I think the signifigance of the way this novel was drawn let's the reader focus on the story of Satrapi's war-filled childhood. She [Satrapi] sticks to the traditional paneling throughout except when there is death, war, or something little Marjane is thinking about (i.e. the tortures of her parents' friend, Ahmadi on Page51. There are no borders on this panel which give it that daydream like state that I have so often mentioned in blog posts before).
How does the lack of detail (the art, not the story itself) help the reader focus on the story, and what comes out of the novel as a whole when the drawings are subtle? The author begins her story so young and naive. In class, we discussed a lot about identity and how Marjane "found" hers. However, I believe the form and style of
Persepolis suggests missing out on a childhood. As we all know,by the end of the book, Marjane is sent away. What stands out to me here, is that she was always so outspoken and ready to argue with her parents,until the moment on page 148 where she says: "At that point, I started to have my doubts. Why say such things if they were coming too?" Not only is Marjane forced to grow up quickly because of the things she has experienced, but she also has to do it for her own well-being. Call that finding your identity if you will, but by showing this progression into adulthood, Marjane tells a wonderful, moving story without using too many abstract ideas or drawings.
Speaking of abstract ideas and drawings, let's move into
Epileptic. As mentioned earlier, Epileptic is also in black and white like
Persepolis. However, this story is effective because of its artwork. How is David B's artwork effective in telling the story?We are told that black and white is what many comics use as to not take away from a story. In the case of Epileptic though, without the detail of little Pierre-Francois's drawings of battles, his intricate daydreams as well as monsters, one would not understand the struggles that accompany an illness like epilepsy.
What is the significance of the abstract ideas and drawings (i.e. monsters, samurai wars, etc)?
In looking at the picture at the beginning of this post, I would argue that Pierre-Francois feels like he needs to protect his family from this disease that is wearing them down. He is in full samurai armor as well as the central figure in this picture. but who is protecting him?However, his brother is nowhere to be seen. Often times, when Jean-Christophe is present in a picture there is a monster lurking in the background...
What is the effect of the "monster" that is drawn when Jean-Christophe is having a seizure or angry about his illness?I think that the author uses these abstract images as a way of dealing. in the beginning of the book, Pierre-Francois is always ready for his brother to have an attack and defends him when others pick on him (Jean-Christophe). As the novel progresses though, Jean-Christophe gets more and more taken over by this monster epilepsy and I think David B is representing that the boy who used to be his best friend is no more.
Finally, how is
Epileptic an effective story but still different from
Persepolis?
Epileptic deals with a topic of illness and the struggles that a family must try to deal with. In writing this story, David B successfully illustrates how his worries and pain had to be put on the back-burner for the well-being of his family. In
Persepolis, we are introduced to a little girl growing up during a war and under a strict regime her parents did not believe in. The way this story is different is that it is more focused on informing the reader of the time as well as showing a progression of a little girl, growing up and becoming more and more knowledgeable of her surroundings.
Epileptic by David B. does not try to inform the reader of the illness by giving definitions or facts, but with intricate drawings straight from the mind of a young child witnessing the effects of epilepsy on his family as well as himself.